Populating Next Right Pointers in O(1) Space
"Populating Next Right Pointers" shows up again and again in Meta, Microsoft, Amazon phone screens. It is a Medium problem on paper, but the real test is whether you recognize the Tree BFS pattern quickly and code it cleanly. Part 7 of 11 in the Tree BFS arc.
The Problem
Given a perfect binary tree, populate each node's next pointer to its immediate right neighbor on the same level (None at level's end). The follow-up is the question: constant extra space, which disqualifies the queue and forces a bootstrapping insight.
Input: root = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
Output: level links 2->3, 4->5->6->7, and None at each level end
Recognizing the Tree BFS Pattern
Breadth-first search explores a tree or graph level by level using a queue, and its defining superpower is the level snapshot: freeze the queue length, process exactly that many nodes, and you have processed one complete level. Anything phrased per-level — level lists, level averages, rightmost visible node, shortest path in unweighted structures — is BFS by construction.
Connect nodes per level screams BFS — but the O(1) constraint flips it: the next pointers you built on level k are the traversal structure for level k + 1. The output data structure replaces the queue. That bootstrapping is the entire insight.
The Approach
Walk the current level via next pointers, wiring children: each node's left child points to its right child, and its right child points to the next node's left child (when a next node exists). Then descend to the leftmost child and repeat.
Perfectness guarantees every internal node has both children, which is what makes the two wiring rules complete. The general-tree version (II) drops that guarantee and needs a dummy-head stitching loop — mention the difference explicitly.
Python Solution
class Node:
def __init__(self, val: int = 0, left: "Node | None" = None,
right: "Node | None" = None, next: "Node | None" = None):
self.val = val
self.left = left
self.right = right
self.next = next
def connect(root: Node | None) -> Node | None:
"""Wire next pointers level by level in O(1) space (perfect tree)."""
leftmost = root
while leftmost and leftmost.left:
node = leftmost
while node:
node.left.next = node.right # within family
node.right.next = node.next.left if node.next else None
node = node.next
leftmost = leftmost.left
return root
Complexity
- Time: O(n) — each node is visited once as a parent and once as a child
- Space: O(1) — the next pointers being built serve as the queue
Interview Tips and Follow-Ups
- Lead with the queue version (O(w) space), then upgrade — showing the ladder is faster than guessing which rung the interviewer wants.
- Recursive solutions carry O(log n) stack — technically not O(1); saying so unprompted is a credibility deposit.
- For non-perfect trees (II): dummy head + tail stitching per level. Same bootstrapping idea, messier wiring — know it exists and how.
If this clicked, continue the Tree BFS arc in the Technical Interview category. One hundred questions, nine patterns, all in Python.
Keep reading
Average of Levels: Aggregating Inside the Snapshot
Replace the level list with a running sum — the aggregation variant. Python solution and complexity analysis for the BFS interview pattern.
Level Order Traversal Bottom Up: One Reverse Away
Bottom-up levels — resist cleverness, reverse at the end. Python solution and complexity analysis for the BFS interview pattern.
Binary Tree Level Order Traversal: The BFS Template
The level-snapshot queue loop that eight other questions reuse verbatim. Python solution and complexity analysis for the BFS interview pattern.
Newsletter
New posts, straight to your inbox
One email per post. No spam, no tracking pixels, unsubscribe anytime.
Comments
- No comments yet. Be the first.